journal :: Bulterman-Bos, J. A. (2008). Will a Clinical Approach Make Education Research More Relevant for Practice?. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 412-420.

last updated: 2008-10-24 09:19:29

Abstract

The way in which researchers view education differs fundamentally from the way in which teachers view education. These different outlooks are (partly) a consequence of the different work roles of researchers and teachers. This article explores the question of whether it is really inevitable that research and practice each establish different views of education. The author shows that the definition of the role of researchers draws heavily on a dualistic view that separates knowledge from skill and detaches human intellectual faculties from other human faculties. Although such dualistic notions are highly contested nowadays, they are institutionalized in the definition of the work of researchers and the purpose of research. The contribution of this article lies in the presentation of a unifying framework in which the views of teachers and researchers can be (at least partially) reconciled in the context of clinical research practice.

Keywords professional development,research utilization,teacher knowledge
Publisher URL http://edr.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/37/7/412
DOI 10.3102/0013189X08325555

Add Tags
Add relevant words or concepts here. Separate each tag with a comma and a space. For example; learning, informal science, cognition



Authors
  • No_image_small_mask_ffffff Jacquelien Bulterman-Bos

Find Similar

To find similar work, check the descriptors and search. Italicized words are custom entries.

Target Audience

Adults (19-54)
Professional

Project Type

Research

Project Setting

School

Subject Area

Informal Learning
Formal/Standards